A Woman Anoints Jesus © Jan L. Richardson
Ooohhhh, you really should check out the January 15 episode of Krista Tippett’s Speaking of Faith radio show. Titled “Preserving Words and Worlds,” the episode highlights the remarkable work of the Hill Museum & Manuscript Library (HMML), which is based at Saint John’s Abbey and University in Collegeville, Minnesota. The HMML is committed to preserving manuscript culture, not only through its work in a variety of locations around the world (including places where texts are in peril because of war), but also through its involvement in the creation of The Saint John’s Bible, the first Bible to be written and illustrated by hand in more than five hundred years. You can listen to the show and take in related features by visiting this delicious page.
At the Speaking of Faith blog, the January 15 entry from online editor Trent Gilliss included a link to a short video about the making of The Saint John’s Bible. A reader of the blog left a comment in response, offering the perspective that “the money would be far better spent feeding the hungry and homeless around the world” and that the Benedictines are “being selfish without realizing it.”
Typically I don’t take that kind of bait in cyberspace, but this was a day I felt drawn to respond to that view, which I encounter frequently in the church—the view that art and justice are two different things and that we have to choose between them (with justice being the “right” choice). What follows is a comment that I left in response. I know it’s longish, but it was a good opportunity to remind myself of why I do what I do, and why people of faith should give a damn about art (and justice, though I can’t conceive of those two being separate).
Comment: Deep thanks for your “Words and Worlds” show and for highlighting the remarkable work of the Hill Museum and Manuscript Library. For a number of years I’ve had occasion to travel to Saint John’s, and have followed with particular interest the HMML. I am fascinated by the crucial work it does both in preserving the sacred texts of many cultures and civilizations and also in supporting the creation of a new manuscript for a new time in the form of The Saint John’s Bible.
I was struck by the comment left by the writer who thought the money would be better spent feeding the homeless and hungry. I’m not certain whether the writer was referring to money spent on The Saint John’s Bible or to the work of the HMML in general, or both together, but the comment illuminates a tension that has long pervaded the church regarding art and justice. I am concerned by how frequently we in the church talk about art and justice as two different things that we have to choose between, rather than as being part of the same impulse: our response to a God of grace and creativity who has placed us in a world that is both broken and beautiful.
The Christian tradition and the Bible itself both developed and survived in large measure because of people across the centuries who gave themselves to transmitting the sacred stories in a variety of creative forms, not just in texts but also in other media including drama, music, and liturgy. In particular, the stunning array of visual art created over the centuries not only helped proclaim the gospel to those who could not read it (as well as those who could) but also was understood to be a gift in return to God: a lavish offering, an act of praise in response to the God who has lavished love, grace, and care upon us.
The fact that we live in the 21st century, when hunger, homelessness, and a host of other injustices continue to inflict deep suffering around the world, does not diminish—and is not separate from—our need for beauty and the sustenance and hope it provides. I find myself thinking of the story in Mark 14.3-9, in which, as Jesus sits at table, a woman comes and anoints him with outrageously expensive oil. Mark tells us that some at the table were angry and said, “Why was the ointment wasted in this way? For this ointment could have been sold for more than three hundred denarii, and the money given to the poor.” Jesus, however, receives her lavish act with grace and gratitude. “Let her alone,” he tells those who scold the woman; “why do you trouble her? She has performed a good service for me. For you always have the poor with you, and you can show kindness to them whenever you wish, but you will not always have me. She has done what she could; she has anointed my body beforehand for its burial. Truly I tell you, wherever the good news is proclaimed in the whole world, what she has done will be told in remembrance of her.”
In saying that we would always have the poor with us, Jesus wasn’t suggesting that we should neglect to work for an end to poverty. Rather, he recognized that lavish acts of generosity, grace, and beauty, such as the woman offered to him, must be part of our response to Christ, alongside our work for justice. Jesus knew that choosing justice at the expense of beauty is just another form of poverty.
I am an ordained minister as well as an artist and writer. I understand my call and my work as a minister to be about feeding people not only in body but also in soul. One kind of feeding cannot long do without the other. I could not work for justice in this world without the creative acts that others have offered across the centuries and in our present time, not only because I could not live without the sustaining hope and beauty they offer, but also because they remind me that God desires us to give lavishly, generously, wantonly from the depths of who we are, and who God has created us to be. Such extravagant acts can seem wasteful. By his response to the anointing woman, however, Jesus reminds us that such gestures of grace bring healing to the body of Christ, and to the whole world.
One of the many gifts of The Saint John’s Bible is that through its related exhibitions, books, prints, cards, and website, not to mention radio and TV shows that have featured it, people are coming into contact with the Bible who might not otherwise encounter it. The Saint John’s Bible also beckons those who think we are oh-so-familiar with the Bible to engage it in a different, deeper, and renewed way. The work of Donald Jackson and his team reminds us that the Bible is not obsolete but rather is a living, dynamic text that invites us to continue not merely to read it but to lavish our attention upon it: to grapple and wrestle with it, to question it, to discern how it still speaks to and challenges us in this time, and to illuminate it, even as it illumines us.
The monks of Saint John’s, and the host of others who participate in the work of the HMML, including the artists, calligraphers, and financial contributors who are making The Saint John’s Bible possible, are offering the world something that is precisely the opposite of selfish. In preserving the sacred texts of the past, in employing ancient methods to offer a sacred text that speaks to us in the present, in drenching us with this audaciously lavish gift, they are offering, in fine Benedictine (and Christian) tradition, a profound act of hospitality.
Amid the brokenness of the world, to which we are called to minister, these folks have given us a rare gift that reminds us that God desires beauty. They bear witness to the fact that recognizing and offering beauty is part of what heals the brokenness. They remind us that God is not yet done with the work of creating, and that God calls us to offer our creative gifts for the healing and feeding of the world.
And that is good news indeed.
January 29, 2009 at 12:46 PM |
you go girl! what an absolutely beautiful and articulate response you have written. it was a great encouragement to me as i consider what my own role in the world is. where do art, justice, work, pleasure, etc. fit? i believe that none of these should be separated. for it is when we live out of our deepest gifts and offer them to the world that “feeding” occurs. it will just look different for each one of us. blessings to you & thank you. peace.
(btw–i love ‘speaking of faith’ and will now look forward to listening to this broadcast.)
January 29, 2009 at 4:05 PM |
Indeed, indeed, amen, amen! My rejuvenated engagement with personal art creation activities has renewed my soul in countless ways. I feel it in my prayer life, in my writing both prose and poetry, I feel it when a paintbrush is in my hand. I again, I say Amen to your comment on what art brings into all lives!
January 29, 2009 at 7:29 PM |
Yes! Art is the articulation of love and truth. Sometimes a work of art is “beauty” which offers pleasure and harmony….sometimes it rends the soul by portraying the pain and suffering that life can contain. But regardless, it speaks to human beings on a wordless level that transcends culture or societal “distinction”. I have heard so many times that people who have no common mode of verbal communication can understand each other deeply in the presence of a humorous situation…or tears…or the awe of intense beauty.
I believe that movement toward harmony is possible through art. People are drawn together (unless they have made up their minds to resist the magnetic force of art) in intimate ways that defy limits imposed by fear of the unknown. When people are drawn together in that way it is often the first chink in the walls we build to protect ourselves and our interests… and a chink can be the beginning of the wall’s collapse.
I give thanks for your ministry…. and I refer many people “The Painted Prayer Book.”
I’ve been listening to ‘speaking of faith’ for years…… one of the shows on the airwaves that opens the mind and the heart to all sorts of fresh possibilities!
January 29, 2009 at 11:52 PM |
A friend of mine alerted me to this program in the Speaking of Faith series. I was touched by Columba Stewart, the director of the Hill Museum and Manuscript Library who was interviewed, and what he said about the role of beauty in monastic life. Is it no wonder that some of the more beautiful and soul-reaching places in Europe have a monastic connection?
Your comment was food for folks like me who feed others in a less literal sense. When we give of the best of ourselves in any way, can it be other than holy?
January 30, 2009 at 10:36 AM |
I’m so glad I visited today! You filled out my morning meditation time with your timely and thoughtful “comment” which I completely agree with and couldn’t have begun to articulate like you. I thrive on these encouragements that keep me doing what I’m doing. For your information, a friend and artist, Makoto Fujimura has just published his latest book: Refractions; a journey of faith, art, and culture which speaks to beauty, art, faith and culture, also in an articulate way. Go to http://www.makotofujimura.com and click on his blog to read his essays which are very thougthful, insightful, faithful, beautiful and cultural–or order the book. I love these threads of thought which need to be written and voiced today. We’re gathering strength. Well done, Jan! I’m anxious to check out “Speaking of Faith” and the HMML.
January 30, 2009 at 10:56 AM |
Well said Jan. Unfortunately it isn’t only the St. John’s Bible that receieves comments like this; too often these days it’s the “arts” in general.
I’ve often wondered if the monks hadn’t undertaken such a project what would people say about Christianity 1000 years from now? Would it look like it died because nobody was working to keep it alive and fresh? How would they know how some of us related to the text (and not just academically)?
I’m very blessed to part of the St. John’s community and am thankful for the project and the monks that have put considerable effort into it.
January 30, 2009 at 12:28 PM |
Thanks so much for all of your insightful and heartening comments! And thanks, too, for the creative work you are each doing in the world.
Phyllis: Many thanks for drawing our attention to Makoto Fujimura. I am so enchanted by his work and didn’t know he had a new book out; it looks wondrous.
Jeff: Amen to what you said about those kinds of comments not being specific to The Saint John’s Bible but to the arts in general. I wrote my response not because that comment from the “Speaking of Faith” listener was unique but rather because it was so typical of the perspective that I often encounter—that art (in all its forms, not just visual) isn’t important or is merely a luxury and therefore tangential to our faith.
The first 2-3 years that I served as artist in residence at a Catholic retreat center (which was an official pastoral appointment), I regularly received the question (oftentimes from my clergy colleagues), “Are you still on that sabbatical?” It grated at first, realizing they saw my appointment as a break from ministry rather an expression of it. But I learned to receive that kind of question as an invitation for conversation about what ministry is, and where it can happen. I pray I’m helping remove a few stones from the road for those who are exploring a creative ministry, even as there were folks who helped remove some stones for me when I was first discerning/creating this path.
Thanks again to all!